The relationship between India and Pakistan has always been complex, influenced by politics, history, and unresolved disputes. Yet, amid these tensions, certain contradictions stand out and raise important questions about fairness and consistency. One of the biggest ironies is that while cricket matches between the two nations are permitted at international tournaments, Sikh pilgrims continue to face hurdles when it comes to freely visiting their holy shrines in Pakistan.
For Sikhs, the land across the border is not foreign—it is sacred. Historic Gurdwaras such as Nankana Sahib, Kartarpur Sahib, and Panja Sahib hold immense spiritual and cultural importance. Despite repeated calls from Sikh organizations for greater access, restrictions remain. The Kartarpur Corridor was a welcome initiative, but it serves only a fraction of the need. If two nations can come together on the cricket field, why can’t they extend the same openness when it comes to religious pilgrimages that symbolize peace and devotion rather than rivalry?
The inconsistency becomes more glaring when one looks at the outrage surrounding art and cinema. Recently, when Punjabi actor-singer Diljit Dosanjh acted in a film where a Pakistani actress played a simple role, voices of protest were loud and sharp. Why should cultural collaboration be seen with suspicion, especially when the same critics have no problem watching Indo-Pak cricket? If the bat and ball can travel across borders, why not music, cinema, or devotion?
At the heart of the matter lies a troubling question: why is the Sikh community so often subjected to discrimination in such cases? Sikhs have consistently promoted peace, brotherhood, and dialogue between India and Pakistan. Yet, when it comes to their rightful demand of unhindered access to their shrines, excuses of “security” and “political tension” are thrown around. At the same time, commercial activities like cricket matches and selective cultural exchanges are allowed, showing a clear double standard.
The Sikh community is not asking for privileges; it is asking for its rights. Pilgrimage is a matter of faith, not politics. It is an act of spiritual connection, not a threat to national security. If cricket diplomacy can exist, why can’t pilgrimage diplomacy? If cultural barriers can be broken for business and entertainment, why not for religion and heritage?
The call is simple: fairness must prevail. Discrimination against Sikhs in matters of pilgrimage and cultural expression not only undermines their rights but also contradicts the very principles of equality and secularism. True peace between India and Pakistan cannot just be played out on cricket pitches or film screens; it must also be reflected in the freedom of people to pray, connect, and share their heritage without discrimination.