Over the past decade and a half, the United States has witnessed major shifts in immigration and deportation policy under three presidents: Barack Obama, Donald J. Trump and Joe Biden. Each administration used the deportation system differently — sometimes with strict interior enforcement, sometimes with border-focused removals, and sometimes with mixed approaches influenced by political pressure, humanitarian concerns and global migration patterns. For Indian nationals, especially from states like Punjab and Haryana, these shifts have had real and measurable effects.
Under Barack Obama (2009–2017), the U.S. recorded the highest overall number of formal removals in modern American history. Across eight years, roughly 2.75 million people were formally deported, averaging more than 340,000 per year. Early Obama years saw intense border enforcement, with annual deportations crossing 390,000 between 2009 and 2012. Only in the later years — particularly 2015 and 2016 — did deportations decline to around 235,000–240,000 per year. However, the U.S. government did not release detailed nationality-wise breakdowns for those years, so the exact number of Indians deported under Obama remains publicly unknown.
Donald Trump’s first term (2017–2021) brought a shift in focus. While overall deportation numbers dropped compared to Obama, enforcement inside the U.S. became more aggressive. Over Trump’s four years, formal removals totaled about 935,000, significantly lower than Obama’s eight-year total but accompanied by broader criteria for arresting undocumented immigrants. For Indian nationals, the numbers became clearer: 6,135 Indians were deported during Trump’s first term, with 2019 being the peak year. Many deportees were young men who had crossed into the U.S. through Central America, believing they could seek asylum. Trump’s policies made such attempts far more difficult.
Joe Biden entered office promising a more humane immigration system, but rising border crossings and political pressure pushed his administration toward tougher enforcement. Deportations fell sharply in 2021 but then rose again. By 2024, the Biden administration recorded 271,000 deportations, the highest annual number in a decade. For Indian nationals, a total of 3,652 Indians were deported during Biden’s four years — fewer than Trump’s first term but still substantial. These included many asylum denials and removals of migrants who entered through the U.S.–Mexico border during the spike in global migration.
The landscape shifted dramatically again in 2025 with Trump’s return to the White House. Within the first half of the year alone, the U.S. deported over 1,700 Indian nationals, a pace significantly higher than both his previous presidency and the later Biden years. Reports from India’s Ministry of External Affairs show that deportation flights — often carrying dozens of Indian citizens at a time — have increased sharply since January 2025. Many of the deportees are Punjabi and Haryanvi youth who attempted irregular migration routes via Latin America, falling prey to smugglers who promised easy entry into the U.S.
Comparing all three administrations shows a complicated picture. Obama deported the most people overall, largely due to massive border removals early in his presidency. Trump deported fewer people overall but removed more Indians and broadened the scope of who could be targeted inside the country. Biden initially slowed deportations but later increased them dramatically, ending his term with the highest annual deportations in ten years. Trump’s second term, based on early 2025 trends, appears set to significantly increase deportations of Indians — perhaps surpassing previous administrations if current rates continue.
For Indian families, especially in Punjab, this data reveals a difficult truth: regardless of who occupies the White House, irregular migration to the United States has become increasingly risky. Each administration, though different in style and rhetoric, has tightened enforcement in its own way. The numbers show that thousands of Indians — many of them young, indebted and misled by agents — have been caught in the middle of this evolving immigration landscape.
.