Some political figures and their families view themselves in relation to the law. When elected representatives or their spouses believe they can intimidate law enforcement officers simply for doing their job, it reveals a dangerous sense of entitlement that strikes at the heart of democratic principles. No one—regardless of political position or family connections—should be above basic traffic laws or have the right to threaten those sworn to enforce them.
The threatening behavior displayed toward Punjab Police officers is not just disrespectful but actively harmful to the rule of law. Police officers must be able to perform their duties without fear of political retaliation or intimidation. When political families attempt to use their influence to escape consequences for clear violations like wrong-way driving, they undermine the entire system of law enforcement and send a message that laws are optional for the privileged few.
This arrogant display sets an alarming precedent for public behavior and governance. If those connected to power feel emboldened to openly defy traffic regulations and threaten officers, what message does this send to ordinary citizens? Such conduct erodes public trust in both the political system and law enforcement, creating a two-tiered justice system where political connections matter more than following the law.
The public has every right to expect that this incident will result in appropriate consequences. Simply being married to an MLA does not grant anyone immunity from traffic laws or the right to intimidate police officers. Swift action must be taken to demonstrate that such behavior is unacceptable and that the rule of law applies equally to everyone, regardless of their political connections or perceived status.