Punjab, a land known for its unique cultural identity, valorous history, and resilient people, is now being governed in a manner that has deeply unsettled its social and political fabric. The increasing control of non-Punjabis, particularly from Delhi, over the political and administrative affairs of Punjab has sparked serious concerns. This creeping dominance has not only undermined the authority of elected Punjabi representatives but also poses a looming threat to the democratic and federal principles enshrined in the Constitution of India.
The situation has become particularly worrisome under the leadership of Arvind Kejriwal, the national convener of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and Chief Minister of Delhi. Though Bhagwant Mann holds the official position of Punjab’s Chief Minister, it is widely perceived that the real power lies in the hands of Kejriwal and his Delhi-based team. Crucial decisions—from bureaucratic appointments to policy directions—are being made outside Punjab, often without any meaningful consultation with local stakeholders. This kind of remote control governance has not only alienated the people of Punjab but also eroded the very foundation of federalism.
Kejriwal’s Delhi team has been systematically infiltrating the state’s administrative machinery. Advisors, strategists, and bureaucrats who have little to no connection with Punjab’s ground realities are now dictating terms. This has led to growing disillusionment among the masses and widespread resentment among civil servants, political workers, and even within the party’s own ranks in Punjab. The Punjabi identity—rooted in language, history, culture, and sacrifice—is now being sidelined in its homeland.
The consequences of this political colonization are already visible. Public policies are being crafted with a Delhi-centric mindset, often ignoring the unique socio-economic conditions of Punjab. Issues like drug addiction, farmer distress, unemployment, and regional imbalances are being addressed through one-size-fits-all solutions that simply do not work in Punjab’s context. Moreover, important local voices are being silenced or ignored, leading to a serious democratic deficit in the state’s governance.
This outsider rule is not merely a political issue; it is quickly turning into a social crisis. The people of Punjab, who have a proud history of fighting oppression, are growing increasingly restless. There is a growing sense of betrayal among the youth, farmers, intellectuals, and even among those who once hoped for a new political alternative through AAP. If the current trend continues unchecked, it could eventually lead to civil disobedience, widespread protests, and a breakdown of law and order. When people feel that they have no say in the governance of their own state, they are left with no choice but to resist.
Kejriwal’s misuse of power to control Punjab from Delhi is not just an overreach—it is an act of political exploitation. By treating Punjab as a colony and its government as a puppet, he is setting a dangerous precedent. If this trend is allowed to continue, it will not only destroy the democratic ethos of Punjab but also destabilize the region permanently. History has shown us time and again that no external force can suppress a people’s identity for long. The longer this imposed rule lasts, the more explosive the backlash will be.
In conclusion, the people of Punjab must awaken to the realities of this political subjugation. True autonomy and respect for Punjab’s identity are non-negotiable. The political leadership of India must intervene before the situation spirals out of control. Otherwise, the consequences—both political and social—will be irreversible. Punjab must be ruled by Punjabis who understand, love, and live its pulse—not by outsiders with vested interests.