The Union Government of India’s decision to introduce the politically sensitive Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, aimed at bringing the Union Territory of Chandigarh under Article 240 of the Constitution, has generated sharp reactions across Punjab. The move is widely seen as legally questionable and politically insensitive, especially given the historical and constitutional context surrounding Chandigarh. For decades, Punjab has asserted that Chandigarh rightfully belongs to the state, a position supported by multiple past commitments made by the Centre. Instead of addressing this long-pending issue, the proposed amendment seeks to grant the Union greater control over Chandigarh, raising concerns about the erosion of federal principles.
Many observers argue that altering the constitutional status of Chandigarh without seeking Punjab’s consent undermines the very foundation of cooperative federalism. The decision appears to bypass the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, and disregards past assurances that promised the gradual transfer of Chandigarh to Punjab. Critics believe that this unilateral approach deepens mistrust between the Union and the state, particularly at a time when Punjab has consistently felt sidelined on matters related to territorial rights, river waters, and administrative autonomy.
Adding to the public frustration is the unexpected silence from the Punjab unit of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Senior leaders including state president Sunil Jakhar, working president Ashwini Sharma, general secretary Parminder Brar, vice president Arvind Khanna, and Union Minister of State Ravneet Singh Bittu have refrained from offering clear public statements on this critical issue. Their silence has become a subject of widespread disappointment, with many questioning their willingness to defend Punjab’s interests during a moment that demands strong and unequivocal leadership.
Across the state, there is growing sentiment that Punjab’s political representatives must rise above party compulsions and stand firm against any move that dilutes Punjab’s constitutional and cultural rights. Chandigarh is not merely an administrative territory; it is a symbol of Punjab’s identity and unresolved injustices. At this moment, unity, assertiveness, and a principled stand are essential to safeguard the state’s rightful claims and to resist any central action that threatens to weaken Punjab’s position.