Jalandhar-In countries like the United States, a simple yet powerful culture exists within public institutions. When a citizen visits a government office, the interaction often ends with a polite and reassuring question: “Do you have any other questions?” This is not merely a formality; it reflects a deeper commitment to transparency, accountability, and respect for the citizens’ voice. It sends a message that governance is a service, not a privilege.
Now contrast this with the troubling developments in Punjab.
A 22-year-old activist, Sukhbir Singh, who dared to question the functioning of the Punjab Police in Faridkot, particularly regarding alleged political protection to drug networks, finds himself in “preventive detention.” The justification? Authorities claim he created a “ruckus.” But one must ask: when did raising uncomfortable questions become equivalent to creating disorder?
Punjab has long battled the devastating impact of drug abuse, a crisis that has hollowed out families and futures. In such a scenario, voices like Sukhbir Singh’s should not be silenced they should be heard, encouraged, and protected. Questioning authority, especially on issues of public interest, is not a crime; it is the very foundation of democracy.
The contrast is stark. On one side, a system that invites questions. On the other, a system that appears to fear them.
If young citizens begin to believe that speaking up will lead to detention rather than dialogue, the consequences for democracy are severe. Silence will replace scrutiny, and fear will replace participation. This is not just about one activist it is about the message being sent to an entire generation.
A healthy democracy does not punish dissent; it thrives on it. It does not suppress questions; it answers them. Punjab must decide which path it wishes to follow.
Because the real question is not whether Sukhbir Singh caused a “ruckus.”
The real question is: Are we afraid of the truth?